top of page

TRAINING TOOLKIT

01

02

03

04

What are the expected outputs of the training toolkit?

The toolkit envisions mainly to facilitate self-assessment and reflection about:

  • institutional practices;

  • interpersonal and community practices (for example, at the level of interaction

among students; between teachers and students; teachers-staff-students etc.).

It also mains at facilitating the identification of HEI’s strengths and opportunities for improvement, and priorities for capacity building.

This self-assessment and reflection can offer greater opportunities for organizational and programmatic growth, as well as opportunities for change and empowerment at the level of group and interpersonal relationships, oriented to prevent and challenge gender based hate and extremism.

In short, this toolkit will help to think about what it looks like to keep innovating and prioritizing HEI’s organizational learning and training goals in regards to challenge gender based hate and extremism.

We would like to invite you to the part of the toolkit in which we have included ‘self-assessment exercises’ which aim prompt self-reflection and discussion on diverse items related to gender based hate and extremism, while, at the same time, to encourage a self-critical attitude.

​

HERE YOU CAN FIND ACTIVITIES FOR 

University students; student's unions
HEI administration and policy- makers
Teaching and non teaching staff
Other inspiring sources

HEI administration and policy-makers (rector, vice-rectors, deans of faculties, heads of departments, directors of research centers)

This tool includes assessment items related to ‘core’ programmatic strategies to address gender based hate and extremism.

Self-assessment activity 1 “Mapping strategies”

Does your HEI/Faculty/Research Center pursue any of the following strategies?

​

Instructions:​

Indicate Yes/No plus comments.

In case your answer is ‘Yes’ please provide comments regarding what you think are the major strengths and weaknesses of concrete actions already pursued.

In case your answer is ‘No’ please briefly explain why your HEI didn’t not follow the strategy in question.

Self-assessment activity 2 “In Action”

This tool includes assessment of core activities related to institutional strategies to address gender based hate and extremism.

​

Instructions:

Answer to the following questionnaire clarifying exactly what is the situation in your organization.

​

At the end, you need to make the sum of points obtained in each domain, in order to take conclusions.

​

If your score is between 4 and 11 points, that means that your institution is far from being aware of the issues related to gender based violence and crime, and there is a need to foster your knowledge on the situation, compare with other institutions, and define a strategic plan.

 

If your score is between 12 and 18 points, that means that your institution is on the track to build a culture of non-discrimination, and gender based violence prevention, however there are still many aspects that need to be faced, whether in relation to health, communication, privacy or involvement of publics more vulnerable to gender based violence.

Questionanaire

Which scenario best describes your HEI?

Teaching and Non-Teaching Staff

In this section, we would invite you to take an active role in this Toolkit by engaging with:

 

  • Self-assessment activities, designed to be completed individually or in small groups;

  • Group activities, designed for several contexts (to be completed amongst

colleagues and in the classroom).

 

All activities aim to encourage a self-critical, questioning and curious attitude towards“Identifying and Challenging Gender Based Hatred and Extremism on Tertiary Education Campuses”.

Self-assessment activity 1 | You and others

Take some time to reflect, and write a few sentences about the following situations:

​

1. A situation (in your personal or professional life) when you felt treated differently than others due to your gender identity.


Now reflect upon the following:

  • Such differentiated treatment had positive or negative implications?

  • Can you explain in detail why?

​

2. An episode when you saw a loved one being treated differently due to gender identity.

​

Now reflect upon the following:

  • What was the reaction of the person involved?

  • What was your reaction?

​

3. An occurrence when you saw a professional colleague being treated differently due to gender identity.

​

Now reflect upon the following:

  • What was the reaction of the person involved?

  • What was your reaction?

​

4. An incident when you saw a student being treated differently due to gender identity. 

​

Now reflect upon the following:

  • What was the reaction of the person involved?

  • What was your reaction? 

 

This reflection aims to identify possible how gender identity has affected you and reflect upon yours and others reactions in different scenarios (both personal and professional).

Self-assessment activity 2 | Identify gender based hate crimes

Think about the most recent high-profile criminal cases in your country and reflect upon which of them constitute gender based hate crimes. In order to help you with this, see below a list of examples.

​

1. Individuals working on a non-profit association that defends women who were victims of domestic violence were subjected to misogynist insults and death threats online.

​

2. A woman was killed by her father after he learned she was pregnant.

​

3. A transgender person was subjected to insults, threatened, slapped and punched in the face when walking on the streets.

​

After identifying a few examples of gender based hate crimes in your community/country, please write a few sentences reflecting upon how such crimes have consequences for society.

Self-assessment activity 3 | References | For teachers only

Take some time to reflect, and write a few sentences about the following situations:

​

  • If you reflect upon the time in which you were a student, who were your main references in your field of study? Were they men, women or gender diverse individuals?

​

  • When you teach, who are the main references you are teaching to your students?

​

After this reflection, please identify:

​

  • What has changed (if any) from the time you were a student.

​

  • What can be done to provide students with sufficient examples of diversity in terms of both men, women and gender diverse individuals’ contributions to each particular field of study?

Group activity 1 | Gender differences

Please start by showing these videos to a group of about 7-10 persons:

​

​

The videos should serve as a platform to kick-start a group discussion about the reactions to these videos, bringing out issues of gender stereotypes.

​

You might want to cover the following topics:

 

  • Are there differences across different courses in your institution in terms of gender balance? 

  • If so, what are the differences?

  • What are the cultural roots of such differences?

  • What can we do to change it, from an individual, institutional and social point of view?

​

This exercise is designed to help you identify and reflect upon factors influencing career paths and to develop reflexive thinking regarding standardized gender roles.

Group activity 2 | A day in the life

Form a group of about 10 people, as diverse as possible.


Ask different individuals to identify their gender identity, in whatever terms they are comfortable with.

​

Categorize the different gender identities that came up in the group and ask one individual of each group to describe what a day in their life looks like, from the moment they wake up to the moment they go to bed. Ask them to be explicit in terms of expectations and responsibilities assigned to them, both by themselves and others.

​

After hearing the descriptions, please discuss the differences in daily routines, particularly in time attributed to the individual and the time attributed to others (both in personal and professional life).

​

Exercise adapted from: https://genderandmedia.bbcmediaaction.org/wp- content/uploads/2021/03/Team-Exercises-to-Explore-Gender-Issues-updated.pdf

Group exercise 3 | Protect yourself

Form a group of about 10 people, as diverse as possible.

​

Ask different individuals to identify their gender identity, in whatever terms they are comfortable with.


Categorize the different gender identities that came up in the group and ask one individual of each group to describe moments when they have felt unsafe.

​

Participants should think about and share things they do to avoid violence and stay safe and reflect upon threats to their safety that they face on a regular basis.

​

After hearing the descriptions, please discuss the differences, reflecting upon the are the main challenges to gender based hatred and extremism in your institution, community and country.

​

Exercise adapted from: https://www.coe.int/en/web/gender-matters/-/safety-in-my-li-1

Group exercise 4 | (Un)safe

Ask participants to imagine the safety level of LGBT+ individuals at various situations, events or locations.

 

Classify each location as “safe alone”; “unsafe alone”; “safe in a group”; “unsafe in a group”.

​

  • At a classroom discussion about LGBT+ rights

  • At University campus, by night

  • At University campus, by day

  • Filling a complain at the administrative office of the University about the homophobic language a teacher used in the classroom

  • Buying contraceptives

  • At a bar

  • Going home after a night out

  • Alone in a room with a hierarchically superior

​

Based upon this reflection, describe the characteristics of settings considered to be ‘unsafe’ for LGBT+ and reflect upon what can be done to increase security.

 

Exercise adapted from: https://www.coe.int/en/web/gender-matters/-/spaces-and-plac-1

Group exercise 5 | Classroom inappropriate | For teachers only, to be applied in the classroom

Distribute post-it notes or cards and ask students to write down what they consider to be unacceptable behavior in the classroom, providing a particular focus on topics associated with sexual harassment, victimization, verbal and physical abuse or violence, etc. Give them 5 minutes.

​

Post all post-it notes or cards in the board and start going one by one, discussing why might such behavior might be considered as inappropriate and/or unacceptable and which consequences it might bring to the victim, both short and long term.

​

Examples might include:

​

  • ‘Staring’ or standing too close;

  • Inappropriate touching;

  • Comments about appearance;

  • Abusive name-calling;

  • Pressuring another person to do something they do not want using blackmail;

  • Non-consent SMS or social media messages;

  • Using homophobic language;

  • Talking or telling jokes of a sexual and obscene nature;

  • Inappropriate questions about someone's sex life or private life;

  • Promoting social isolation;

  • Spreading rumors and/or malicious comments;

  • Shouting, as a way of intimidating people;

​

After the group identifies and lists unacceptable behavior, finalize the exercise by asking students to,anonymously, write down in how many situations of this kind they have been involved as victims.

​

This will give the group a clearer idea of the prevalence of harassment and sexual harassment in the classroom.

University Students, Students’ Unions

Activity 2 “In Action”

This activity encompasses reflecting on the programming of a set of events that can involve students to critically reflect on gender based hate and extremism.


This activity can be performed in two moments. At first, each student writes individually their notes/ideas/comments on each of the proposed activities. In a second moment, each student presents their individual proposal.

 

After this round of presentations, a collective deliberation is made to reach consensus on the structure, content and program of activities for each proposed events.

​

The list of proposed events is the following:

 

  • School assemblies addressing the issue of violent extremism; open discussions on contentious issues;

​

  • Development of anti-bullying policies and codes of conduct through participatory processes involving students, teachers, school personnel and families;

​

  • Student welfare and well-being services (including guidance and counselling services);

​

  • Youth-driven projects that support intercultural dialogue and inclusive climates;

​

  • Invitation of guest speakers to discuss issues with students and parents: law enforcement officers, former violent extremists, media/internet professionals, etc.

bottom of page